Environmental performance of the water and sewerage companies
On 10 July 2019 the Environment Agency (EA) published Environmental performance of the water and sewerage companies, a report suggesting that water companies efforts to protect the environment were ‘simply unacceptable’ with only 1 of them performing at the level expected.
The annual report rates each of the 9 water and sewerage companies in England as green, amber or red on a range of measures including pollution, supply resilience, and complying with permits.
The report reveals that water company performance has deteriorated, reversing the gradual improvement that had been seen in since the rating system began in 2011. Serious pollution incidents have also increased in 2018, causing damage to rivers and wildlife.
Northumbrian Water was the only company to achieve the highest 4 star rating. The EA said this improvement should be applauded and had only been possible with focus from the top of the organisation and ongoing effort from operational teams.
Other findings included:
- Severn Trent Water, United Utilities and Wessex Water dropped from 4 stars to 3 stars.
- Anglian Water and Thames Water remained on 3 stars.
- Southern Water, South West Water and Yorkshire Water were only given 2 stars, described as an ‘unacceptable level of performance.’
- South West Water has consistently demonstrated unacceptable performance and a red rating for pollution incidents.
- Southern Water and Thames Water failed to demonstrate they have robust enough plans to maintain secure water supplies.
- Most water companies look set to fail to meet 2020 pollution targets.
Environment Agency Chair Emma Howard Boyd, said they will continue to work with Ofwat to look at financial penalties to drive better environmental performance and that companies should be reflecting on their environmental performance and long-term resilience - if this is poor they should be asking themselves whether dividends are justifiable.
Executive Director of Operations Dr Toby Willison said: “Water companies need to clean up their act. People expect water companies to improve the environment, not pollute rivers and ensure secure supplies of water. With only one exception, none of the companies are performing at the level we wish to see, the country expects and the environment needs. We will continue to challenge CEOs to improve company performance and we will take strong and appropriate enforcement action. Companies performing well have a positive ripple effect on the natural environment and communities in their regions. We want all water companies to meet the expectation of their customers, the needs of environment and learn from the best practice that the leading company is demonstrating.”
The full report is available at: Environmental performance of the water and sewerage companies.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- 2019 Price review draft determinations for water companies.
- Environment Agency.
- Flood and Water Management Act
- Groundwater control in urban areas.
- Mains water.
- Sustainable water.
- Urban water systems management: A data analytics approach EP 105.
- Water Act 2014.
- Water conservation
- Water consumption
- Water framework directive.
- Water Industry Act 1991.
- Water investment.
- Water quality.
- Water.
Featured articles and news
The act of preservation may sometimes be futile.
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.